A TALE OF TWO BROTHERS

18 APRIL 09

MY HOME 2

CIVIL LINES,

"UNREVEALING THE SECRETS OF UNIVERSE"

PART II

JUPITER AND SATURN--

THE REASON WHY I GAVE THE TITLE AS "A TALE OF TWO BROTHERS" IS THAT THESE TWO PLANETS HAVE A LARGE SIZE

JUPITER AND SATURN ARE THE TWO MOST SURPRISING PLANETS. JUPITER IS THE LRGEST PLANET.WE CANT SAY JUPITER IS A SOLID PLANET.JUPITER IS A GASEOUS PLANET. JUPITER HAS NO ATMOSPHERE. THE PLANET HAS MORE PERCENTAGE OF GAS HYDROGEN.ABOUT 89% OF HYDROGEN.THE HELIUM FORMS ABOUT 9%. THIS PLANET HAS ICE OF AMMONIA AS WELL. JUPITER'S GRAVITY IS THE MAXIMUM THAN ANY OTHER PLANET. THE REASON ITS ITS THE LARGEST OF ALL PLANETS.ITS MASS IS 317.8 TIMES THAN THE EARTH.THE ORANGE AND BROWN CLOUDS OF JUPITER ARE BECAUSE OF UPWELLING COMPOUNDS THAT CHANGE THE COLOUR WHEN THEY ARE EXPOSED TO ULTRA-VIOLET LIGHT OF SUN..

2] GREAT RED SPOT OF JUPITER AND OTHER STORMS

JUPITER IS FAMOUS FOR THE GREAT RED SPOT.IT IS A ANTICYCLONIC STORM THAT MOVES 22 DEGREE SOUTH OF THE EQUATOR.. 

 IT IS LARGER THAN EARTH..

IT HAS BECOME IDENTITY OF JUPITER AND IT CAN BE SEEN FROM THE EARTH AS WELL.<in the above image,we can see great red spot>

AWESOME FACTS---

1]IT HAS RINGS

2] IT IS 778 MILLION KM AWAY FROM SUN

3] 11.86 earth years is time of revolution

4] it has 63 moons

It is the most fascinating planet of all..

2] Saturn

SATURN IS CALLED AS THE CROWNED PLANET AS IT HAS RINGS VISIBLE FROM EARTH. THIS RINGS WHEN VIEWED FROM EARTH LOOK BEAUTIFUL. A PERSON WHO OBSERVES THESE RINGS REALLY CANT FORGET IT

SATURN IS SIMILAR TO JUPITER. IT IS ALSO CALLED GAS GIANT ITS ATMOSPHERE HAS MAINLY 96% OF HYDROGEN AND 3 % OF HELIUM.IT HAS ICES OF AMMONIA.

 ABOUT IT'S RINGS--

SATURN'S RINGS HAVE A THICKNESS ABOUT 20M.THEY HAVE ABOUT  93% ICE OF WATER. THIS RINGS ACTUALLY IS A BAND OF ASTEROIDS,PARTS FROM OTHER PLANETS,AND OTHER CELLESTIAL BODY.THEY 

<the thermal image obtained of saturn showing temp..variation>

MOVE IN ROTATION AS WELL AS REVOLUTION AROUND SATURN. THIS BAND OF RINGS IS THOUGH STABLE BY ORBIT BUT THERE IS CONSTANT COLLISION BETWEEN THE COMPONENTS OF SATURN'S RINGS.U CAN SAY BOMBARDING. IT IS VERY DIFFICULT FOR A SATELLITE TO TAKE ENTRY NEAR THE SURFACE OF SATURN PASSING THROUGH THE BAND OF ROCKS IN THE RINGS. 

AWESOME FACTS

1]  TILL DATE ABOUT 200 MOONS OF SATURN ARE OBSERVED

2] SATURN'S MOON TITAN IS THE MOST INTERESTING MOON.IT IS LARGEST MOON IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM.IT HAS ATMOSPHERE.. MAINLY OF SULPHUR. 

3] IT IS 95.152 TIMES THE EARTH

4]SATURN TAKES ABOUT 29 AND HALF YEARS FOR ONE REVOLUTION

5] ITS ROTATION TIME IS ABOUT 10 HOURS.

THUS THIS TWO PLANETS WILL KEEP FASCINATING US ALL TIME.THE MYSTERIES REGARDING THE STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION IS STILL LOCKED BUT WE WILL TRY TO EXPLORE IT

Next discussion includes the relative comparison between the earth and mars.also the possibility of life there

SUPPORTER OF EXPLORATION OF UNIVERSE

Akshay Deoras

MISCONCEPTION REGARDING PLANETS

17TH APRIL 09

MY HOME 2

CIVIL LINES

I COMPLETE 35 ARTICLES ON BLOG.For celebration, i present a series-"UNREVEALING THE SECRETS OF UNIVERSE" WHICH CONSISTS OF SOME ARTICLES THAT WILL HELP UNDERSTANDING THE UNIVERSE IN A BETTER WAY

surface of mercury with crater impact>

My Todays discussion involves misconception about a planet--- Mercury 

well we all know that mercury is the first planet from sun. though the people think that the temperature on mercury must be hot.so hot that one cant live. but recently i asked a question to students of my school whether venus is hotter than mercury? and they confidently answered 'NO

MERCURY IS HOTTER AS IT IS NEARER TO THE SUN'

I wanted to include this discussion since many days but it wasnt possible.

1] MERCURY

mercury is the first planet of our solar system due to its location from the sun

the side away from the sun has a temperature of about <-184 C>

the side infront of sun has a temperature of 427 C

whreas venus has a temperature of about 480 C

thus we can infer that venus is  hotter than mercury despite of its position.

the reason behind this is atmospheric composition of venus. Venus is a planet which has extremely dence atmosphere.atmosphere consists mainly of Carbon-di-oxide

you can't believe that venus is hotter than mercury and also than earth because of global warming. carbon-di-oxide molecule has a high capacity of holding heat molecules. the atmosphere of venus is made of carbon-di-oxide.the atmosphere has 96.5% CO2. whereas mercury has TRACE AMOUNT OF CO2  IN atmosphere.so venus is hotter than mercury. AS MERCURY HAS NO ATMOSPHERE, SO the heat caused by sun's rays is reflected back and some heat is absorved so its temperature is less. but as the atmosphere of venus is made of CO2,it traps the heat reflected back from the surface.on earth this heat is essential to keep life going on.but the temperature increases as the green house gases like CFC trap more heat molecule from the rays reflected back from earth.. 

this helps venus to be hotter......

SOME ANOTHER FEATURES OF MY FAVOURITE PLANET VENUS--

1] VENUS IS MUCH BRIGHTER IN THE SKY THAN OTHER PLANETS IN WINTERS AS THE CLOUDS WHICH ARE MADE UP OF SULPHUR-DI-OXIDE REFLECT 80% RAYS THAT FALL ON VENUS.SO IT IS BRIGHTER AND BRIGHTEST DURING WINTER...

2] ON VENUS,AS THE GRAVITY IS LESS,WHENEVER THERE IS LIGHTNING,THE LIGHTNING REMAINS IN THE SKY AND DONT GET ATTRACTED TOWARDS SURFACE LIKE THAT HAPPENED INFRONT OF MY HOUSE..

3] THERE IS RAIN ON VENUS OF SULPHURIC ACID

4] THE NAME VENUS IS OF A GODDESS OF LOVE,WHO WAS FAMOUS FOR HER BEAUTY..

AFTER SEEING VENUS,IT SEEMS TO BE FALSE.

5] IT ROTATES FROM EAST TO WEST.IT MAY BE DUE TO ASTEROID IMPACT.

ABOUT MERCURY

1] THERE IS ICE ON MERCURY.SCIENTIST BELIEVE IT CAME FROM THE A NEARBY ASTEROID OR COMET THAT ONCE IMPACTED ON MERCURY.

2] MERCURY'S PHYSIOGRAPHY  IS UNEVEN.THERE ARE MOUNTAINS,TRENCHES,VALLEY AND RIVER ON MERCURY. 

3] IT IS AMONG THE MOST ASTEROID IMPACTED PLANET.

THE NEXT DISCUSSION WILL INCLUSE THE PLANETS JUPITER AND THE LORD OF RINGS--SATURN

For

UNREVEALING THE SECRETS OF UNIVERSE

Akshay Deoras

Comet, a space injection for life transmission

17th april

my home--

todays talk include a discussion about space injection.it doesnt have a needle or syringe.i am talking about the comets and asteroids. injection is a instrument which transmits certain chemical which r useful for us in or body directly.so result and effect is quick.we can introduce these chemicals in our body by taking medicines,tablets etc.. but they will take a longer time

similarly on any cellestial object,life can develope but that is actually a slow but continuous evolution process. now as it seems that there is ice on mercury because of impact of nearby comet.. similarly the question cant a comet or asteroid be used to transmit life in universe.though it can be done purposely as well. the question is that we can do this thing by sending a spacecraft on the desired planet.but it takes time.if there is a life in universe and especially adopted to comet then after the impact on any planet, the life can develope there. we can also make a use of this concept. we can locate a comet and asteroid,track its position and approach and accordingly send a impacter on it with the basic life material like dna etc.. 

This is practically possible as we have sent spacecraft on the comets and asteroids. we also know the places which support the life like in due course of time,moon of jupiter--- Europa,has a sort of ice floating on water.Scientist believe as temperature of sun rises,europa can support life.so by imapacting a comet that is moving to europa.. impact that comet and put dna on it.when it impacts,the life will develop there. now by studying the effects of the local environment on the cell,we can develope a technology that will overcome all the difficulties and will help man to survive

SO NO 'SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST' AS PER CHARLES DARWIN

SUPPORTER OF THE LIFE

AKSHAY DEORAS

Universe of My Dreams!!

THE WORLD IS JUST AWESOME WITH AWESOME UNIVERSE

THIS DISCUSSION INCLUDES A TALK ON 'WHAT IS BEYOND THE UNIVERSE'

before that a simple question.take a cube and view it from by facing one of its edge.so we get a 3d picture.now view the from top,we get a 2d picture. and ofcourse if we concentrate at one of the end of edges,we see a 0D picture.. but we say that cube is 3d object..

similarly we say universe is three dimesional with the 4th dimension as time.i consider EM waves as the 5th dimension.now the universe is made of the dimension.. suppose we say a object which is dimensional less it can't be viewed.but it is not necessary that it doesnt exisist.

can i call that this is the reason why we cant see the air? think abt it

regarding the universe, some people say that without dimension,universe cant exist.

but in my previous article"" THE JOURNEY TO THE BOUNDARY OF UNIVERSE"" I TALKED ABOUT THE BOUNDARY.although i didnt emphasize on location. now i talk about the :what is there beyond universe"

the answer is that if we sit on earth and wonder to reach there,the approximate boundary is so far away that only light reach the earth.so time will be stopped as per earth and the time will not exist

so space will not exist as space and time are interrelated.so there will be no space. so no vacuum. as there is no space or no traces of space.

now only thing that is left is something which is not discovered and it is moving relative to the universe expansion.

now what is to discover is this something. but let us suppose that there is a planet there.for that planet the universe is its surrounding area and for him the beyond his universe is our universe.but it doesnt say that there can be no universe beyond our universe.. as it is in this case.so frame of refrence is thing that matters. it is easy to tell the boundary but difficult to tell what is beyond it

i give emphasis on the relative frame of refrence for this discussion and say that there is our universe beyond our universe only

to explain this, consider earth.we start from japan.then we go to china,russia,europe,atlantic,usa and if we move similarly we come back to japan.. so for japan beyond japan there are these countries.but the part of los angeles or san fransisco where the sunrise is late and our day in asia is over when they start their day.for them beyond the los angeles there are again countries.this is a principle of curvature......

space and time are curved. it may be like a folded paper and we say the two ends are the boundaries. SO WE MAY INFER THAT THERE IS OUR UNIVERSE BEYOND OUR UNIVERSE.THE BOUNDARY ABOUT WHICH I WAS TALKING WAS THE END OF UNIVERSE FOR US WHICH IS THE BEGINING OF UNIVERSE FOR SOME OTHER PERSON!!!ALSO UNIVERSE IS 3D LIKE EARTH.

EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION BETWEEN 18TH AUGUST TO 10 SEPTEMBER 09

                                  

DEAR ALL

I HAD RECEIVED ONE MAIL ABT TSUNAMI ON 22ND JULY 09.AFTER SEEING THE

MAIL MY INTEREST INCREASED A LOT AND I SAT TO STUDY THE EARTHQUAKES

SINCE 16TH CENTURY. I COMPARED THE EVENTS. I ALSO FOUND A PRINCIPLE

THAT WHENEVER THERE IS A SOLAR ECLIPSE AND LUNAR ECLIPSE WITHIN THE

PERIOD OF 15 DAYS,THEN AN EARTHQUAKE TAKES PLACE. I DEDUCED A METHOD

THAT FOR EG..THERE IS LUNAR ECLIPSE ON 10TH JULY AND SOLAR ECLIPSE ON

25TH JULY THEN THERE CAN BE A EARTH TO STABILIZE THE DISTURBANCE.

DURING A EARTHQUAKE, THERE IS A PULL OF SUN AND MOON FROM SAME

SIDE AND ON OPPOSITE SIDE ON LUNAR ECLIPSE.AS TIDES ARE

AFFECTED BY THE GRAVITY, THE PLATES OF EARTH ARE ALSO ATTRACTED BY THE

GRAVITY.BUT EARTH TRIES TO STABILIZE ITS PLATES BY CREATING A WAVE

CALLED THE EARTHQUAKE.

IF THERE IS A LUNAR ECLIPSE THEN THE EARTH IS PULLED FROM THE ONE SIDE

AND THE SUN PULLS FROM THE OTHER SIDE. AS SUN'S GRAVITY IS STRONGER

THAN MOON'S GRAVITY THE EARTH GETS PULLED MORE FROM ONE SIDE AND LESS

FROM ONE SIDE. NOW WITHIN 15 DAYS IT IS PULLED FROM ONE SIDE AND NOT

FROM OTHER SIDE.SO IT STABILIZES

ROLLERS> CREATING A SESMIC WAVE.

NOW ON THE BASIS OF THE PHENOMENA IT TAKES ABOUT 2 MONTHS FOR THE

FINAL WAVE.

I AM NOT PLAYING A JOKE I HAVE EXAMPLES

october 3 1915

an earthquake took place at pleasant valley in usa..

24 Aug 1915 at  21:27   Penumbral eclipse was seen in this region.

as per the above statements

10 august 1915 a annular solar eclipse is seen in this region. the

pleasant valley has the lunar eclipse at moonrise...

and as i said within 2 months earthquake took place.

2] May 12 2008

earthquake in the schichuan province,china.

feb. 21 2008 a lunar eclipse was seen here

beb.7 2008 a solar eclipse was seen

and as i again said this region viewed an eclipse. so there was earthquake here.

i have many such incidence. and ofcourse they arent coincidences like

tht of assasination of the presidents of us.

u can verify this principle by searching the dates of earthquake,lunar

and solar eclipse

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_solar_eclipses_in_the_21st_century

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_21st_century_lunar_eclipses

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_earthquakes

it took about 10 hours of continuous study of these dates and concept

behind it. ofcourse i did it alone

now

THE TOTAL LUNAR ECLIPSE IS ON 22ND JULY AND THE PENUMBRAL LUNAR

ECLIPSE IS ON 7TH JULY.

next earthquake------

BETWEEN 26th august TO 10th OF september 09

PLACE

IN PACIFIC OCEAN

accordingly chances of tsunami is there.

KINDLY DON'T DISCLOSE THIS MAIL TO ANYBODY NOR FORWARD IT TO UR

FRIEND.THIS MAIL IS FOR SELECTED PEOPLE. MY HARDWORK WILL GO WASTE.SO

KEEP THIS MAIL WITH YOU.

it is now obvious that the earth stabilizes back to its position after

producing earthquake like for stabilisation of anything it has to do

some activity

also the location predicted by me has also matched with the person

whose picture of prediction u can see on google

AGAIN THESE ARE THE PREDICTIONS BASED UPON concept. 100%ACCURACY

CANT BE EXPECTED...

observation and reasoning 2

we have concluded that there are chances of
earthquake striking place provided in the attachment on 2nd september
09
but we give the disaster window between 26st august to 10th september 09

some observations observed by us will help u to understand this
concept.the concept behind it remains the same about gravitational
pull.


1] SOLAR ECLIPSE OBSERVED ON 8TH JUNE 1937.IT WAS A TOTAL SOLAR
ECLIPSE FOR 7 MIN 4 SECONDS.

  LUNAR ECLIPSE WAS OBSERVED ON 25TH MAY 1937 FOR A PERIOD OF 110 MINUTES

  THE RESULTANT EARTHQUAKE TOOK PLACE ON JULY 22 1937 AND WAS OF
MAGNITUDE 7.3 ON RICHTER SCALE.
  IT TOOK PLACE AT SALCHA,ALASKA USA..
  THE DIFFERNCE BETWEEN THESE TWO DAYS
IS OF 15 DAYS.


2] SOLAR ECLIPSE OBSERVED --

 11TH JULY 1991 for 6 min 53 seconds .
 there was a total solar eclipse observed.

 LUNAR ECLIPSE OBSERVED
 JUNE 27TH 1991 FOR 110 MINUTES

 THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE TWO DATES IS 15 DAYS
 IT IS THE PERIOD TAKEN BY MOON TO GO FROM DARK SIDE INTO LIGHT SIDE.

 EARTHQUAKE TOOK PLACE ON 17TH AUGUST 1991 AT HONEYDEW,CAIF,USA
 MAGNITUDE OF EARTHQUAKE----------    7.1 ON RICHTER SCALE..

 FROM THE ABOVE OBSERVATIONS,THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EARTHQUAKE DATE
AND SOLAR ECLIPSE IS 37 DAYS AND 46 DAYS RESPECTIVELY.
 THESE ARE SPECIAL OBSERVATIONS FOR A TOTAL SOLAR ECLIPSE AND
PENUMBRAL LUNAR ECLIPSE WITH NODE- A.
 THE MEAN PERIOD FOR THIS IS 42 DAYS.

 FOR THIS YEAR LUNAR ECLIPSE IS ON 7TH JULY
AND SOLAR ECLIPSE IS ON 22ND JULY
SO, ACCORDING TO THE STUDY OF THE ABOVE OBSERVATIONS, THE RESULTANT
EARTHQUAKE,WILL BE ON 2nd SEPTEMBER 09 AND OF MAGNITUDE 7.0+ ON
RICHTER SCALE

LOCATION OF THIS EARTHQUAKE REMAINS SAME...
 CHANCES OF TSUNAMI WAVES ORIGINATING FROM THE PACIFIC ARE THERE.........

cosmic lightnings

My home 

Nagpur

I was on terrace setting up a dummy transmitter antenna. i saw lightning in the sky. i observed one phenomena that when ever i saw a lightning in south immediately lightning was seen in the north. though this has nothing to do with it. today i talk about the cosmic lightnings. This can be a general phenomena which is similar to lightning on earth.of course after seeing lightning felling 5metres away from my house,my interest has increased..

whenever there is friction between the clouds energy is created. it is a combination of light and sound energy. in universe in the places there is vacuum, friction doesnt take place. but the places where there is matter lightning can take place.

ARTICLE TO BE CONTINUED 

AKSHAY DEORAS

fACTOR "A" RELATED TO DARK ENERGY

18th may 06

Charan tower

sukhumvit road

Soi 43-

Bangkok-Thailand

Dear all, I am back after a long gap. today i am publishing a thought which came in my mind while i was in bangkok. in the recent articles You must have seen the disussions about the boundaries-thus the growth of universe...

it is now discovered that the cause of this growth is Dark Energy. till the year 2006, we were not aware of this concept. recently after astronomical observtions this concept is known to us

LET US GET INTRODUCED

In physical cosmology and astronomy, dark energy is a hypothetical form of energy that permeates all of space and tends to increase the rate of expansion of the universe.this is actually a hypothetical concept.its observations can be studied through supernovae explosions.

it is said that dark energy is generally homogenus mixture.it interacts with the fundamental forces- nuclear force,EM force,weak force but doesnt interact with the gravity. the term of negative pressure is also concerned.. the dark energy has to maintain a pressure so that there is a constant rate of expansion of universe. as per E=MC2 this energy is convertible with the mass of universe.so energy of expansion=mass of universe x  square of velocity of light in vacuum. 

FROM THIS WE CAN INFER THAT THERE CAN BE SOMETHING WHICH CAN BALANCE THIS DARK ENERGY.. LET IT BE ENERGY "A" SO IF

1] A = DARK ENERGY 

then the rate of expansion will be halted.the mass and energy in the universe will remain constant and possibly there will be no explosions..

2] A>DARK ENERGY

then the acceleration may become deceleration that is it will collide the universe and can take us back to BIg Bang. thus as time is 4th d of space,time will go back..

3]A

 this will cause no effect on deceleration and acceleration will continue with a limited rate

 this can be present situation

4] A=zero

that is there is only dark energy then the universe will rapidly expand with a violent form

the chance of A=0 is very less as there is a resistance to every thing in nature.

however it is very difficult to tell whether the A can exisist or not. we have found that universe is expanding at a rapid stage from this it seems that A=0 but A cant be =0 

i believe the energy absorved by a black hole can be equal to energy release by a supernova explosion. so as in one case there is a release of energy, other case there is a absorve . but the question arises that to nulify the growth of entire universe, we require a black hole equal to mass of universe and that is not possible.. so i believe that there is no universe beyond the universe. i will write an article soon on universe beyond universe.. 

FINAL CONCLUSION

WE HAVE THE FACTOR "A" THAT CAN NULIFY THE UNIVERSE BUT IT IS A CONCEPT. MATHEMATICALLY NOTHING LIKE IT CAN WORK SO AS TO STOP GROWTH OF UNIVERSE!!!!

Rings Of Space!!!

03rd march,
Jet airways terminal,
Chatrapati Shivaji International Airport
Mumbai

Todays discussion includes about the rings of plantes. It is for the first time for some readers that there are 4 planets that have rings--

jupiter,Saturn,Uranus,Neptune.

we say and we have seen the rings about saturn but the others ofcourse not.

theories about the rings of saturn are two-

the first theory says that there was a collision with a moon.

second one says that they were the debris of the a nearby explosion. although it is more clear that the moon theory is right. there are similar theories for other rings of other planets.

earth was born in similar way. but we are very sure that earth has no ring. but one can say that the debris all that are in atmosphere. but the properties are different.

if we observe the components of atmosphere that is chief gases in atmosphere,we can get a link.

according to me,

the findings of gases like hydrogen and helium in large quantities and that of
deuteride and methane in small quantities can help in solving the mysteries.

hydrogen and helium are the combustible gases. we have observed in daily life about their combustibility. but at the same time methane is less combustible and not as hydrogen. since the gases like hydrogen and helium have the maximum percentage in atmosphere of all the ring planets like

jupiter,saturn,uranus,neptune and all of them have minimum methane.AT the same time

mercury has 42% molecular oxygen,22% hydrogen

venus has 96.5% carbon di oxide and little traces of hydrogen

earth has 78% nitrogen and little trace of hydrogen

mars has 95% carbon di oxide and little trace of hydrogen

pluto has maximum trace of nitrogen

as it is clear that THEY DONT HAVE RINGS

2] RING PLANETS

JUPITER HAS 89.8% HYDROGEN,10.2% HELIUM

SATURN HAS 96% HYDROGEN,3% HELIUM

URANUS HAS 83% HYDROGEN,15% HELIUM

NEPTUNE HAS 80% HYDROGEN,19% HELIUM

so it is clear that the planets which have a ring have large quantities of hydrogen and helium in their atmosphere. when the planets were formed, at that time these planets must have been very reactive. as a result, there would have been constant consmic collision and combustible reactions. as a result matter from these planets would have been exploded in space and eventually they would have been cooled and when the planets took more or less geoid shape,these particles would have been attracted by the gravity and likewise now they are around the planets like jupiter,saturn,uranus,neptune. in the case of earth and other planets similar things would have happened but there wouldn't have been combustible reactions in atmosphere so the matter would not have remained like particles. rather we can say moon must have been formed.. like that of explosion theory for the formation of earth's moon. even the ring planets are more or less gaseous and are different from non-ringed planets. jupiter has a peculiar colour likewise saturn also they are the biggest in the solar system.uranus is the 3rd largest planet by size, neptune is windy planet. so is it because of the rings they are so large and have very unique characters. the rings are paricles of matter irregular in shape and moving with the planet in the orbit. because there atmosphere has violent gases to which when a meteror or asteroid would have strucked there could have been combustion and formation of debris.\

let us wait and watch what happens

we are lucky that there are ringed planets which increase the prestige of our planet!!!

akshay deoras

Can magnet affect human speech?

SCIENCE EXHIBITION

1] EFFECT OF MAGNET ON SOUND DIRECTLY
WE KNOW MAGNET IS VERY USEFUL IN MANY THINGS
WE USE IN OUR DAILY LIFE AND NOW AS SCIENCE IS DEVELOPED WE ARE USING FOR OUR PROTECTION OF LIFE IN MANY ASPECTS..
BUT NOBODY MUST HAVE THOUGHT OF EFFECT OF MAGNET ON SOUND. IF ANYONE LISTENS IT, HE WILL SAY IT IS RUBBISH. SOME WISE PEOPLE MAY SAY YES WITHOUT READING THE TITLE AND CAN SAY SPEAKERS?. BUT I HAVE USED THE WORD DIRECTLY. THIS MEANS WHEN WE TAKE A MAGNET NEAR THE OBJET FOR EG.. TV WHERE THE SOUND THOUGH IS PREVIOUSLY CONVERTED, BUT THE SOUND COMES OUT. IF WE TAKE A POWERFUL MAGNET CAN THAT OF THE RADIO NEAR THE TV,ITS SOUND CHANGES. IT GOES DEEP!!
EXPLAINATION--
EVERY MAGNET HAS A MAGNETIC FIELD. THIS ARE THE IMAGINARY LINES,USUALLY CIRCULAR AROUND THE POLES AND FROM THE POLES TO THE BOUNDARY MAGNETIC FIELD IS ACTIVE. IF WE KEEP A PARTICLE IT GETS ATTRACTED TOWARDS IT. BUT OUTSIDE IT IT DOESNT. LIKEWISE UNLIKE THE LIGHT SOUND IS A DISTURBANCE THAT TRAVELS IN FORM OF WAVES.
IT IS SIMILAR TO RIPPLES IN WATER..
NOW LET US SUPPOSE THE RADIO AND TV ARE PERPENDICULAR TO EACH OTHER. THE WORK DONE BY THE FORCE OF THIS TWO OBJECTS IS PERPENDICULAR.. WE KNOW THAT COS 90 IS O. SO NOTHING WILL HAPPEN.
LIKEWISE IF WE SEE IN THE ABOVE FIGURE,THAT IF WE KEEP RADIO JUST NEAR THE
WHEN THE MAGNETIC LINES INTERSECT EACH OTHER <>
THEY MAKE A SEPERATE WAVE WHOSE ENERGY IS LESS THAN THE FORMER TWO
SO THOSE WAVES COME IN OUR EARS AND WE FEEL THE CHANGE
THIS IS APPLICABLE TO ALL OBJECTS WHO HAVE A WAVE NATURE
{ IN ABOVE REFRENCE, THE MAGNETIC FIELD THOUGH IS NOT A WAVE BUT WE CONSIDER IT AS WAVE BECAUSE OF ITS FIELD}
{ IT IS A LIMITED BOUNDARY [AMPLITUDE] BUT SOUND WAVES HAS A MORE BOUNDARY[LIMIT] AS COMPARED TO THE MAGNETS[ RADIO ONE]}

My condolence to OCO Team!!!

dear all,

another sad news comes up after the satellitte collison of iridium 33 and cosmos 2251. i was thouroughly following the orbiting carbon observatory mission of Nasa since many days. Everything was going smoothly. i was in school in computer lab watching nasa tv. i didnt have lunch also as i was busy throughout the recess watching the launch. as there were no speakers we were unable to hear the countdown. we all became worried because of the 4mins delay and after that launch took place at obout 3:25:30 pm IST. as the recess was over i had to rush down to class. when i saw the news about the failure in seperation of the satellite and taurus rocket, i was shocked

HERE ARE SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF TAURUS ROCKET-

Taurus is a four stage, solid fuel launch vehicle built by Orbital Sciences Corporation. It is based on the air-launched Pegasus rocket from the same manufacturer. The Taurus rocket is able to carry a payload of around 1,350 kg into a low Earth orbit. First launched in 1994, it has successfully completed six out of a total of eight military and commercial missions.[1] Two launches have ended in failure, including the February 24, 2009 launch of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory mission.[2]

ITS MISSIONS--

This handout photo released by Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., shows the launch early Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2009, of a Taurus XL rocket equipped with NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory satellite which apparently failed to separate from the launch vehicle and splashed into the ocean. (AP Photo/ U.S. Air Force, Airman 1st Class Andrew Lee)

List of launches
Flight number
Date
Vehicle type
Payload
Result
1
March 13, 1994
ARPA Taurus
STEP Mission 0 & DARPASAT
Success
2
February 10, 1998
Commercial Taurus, 92" payload fairing and 63" dual payload attach fitting
GFO and ORBCOMM (Satellites 11,12)
Success
3
October 3, 1998
Air Force Taurus Configuration, 63" fairing, Peacekeeper Stage 0
Space Technology Experiment (STEX) for National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)
Success
4
December 20, 1999
Model 2110, 63" fairing, Castor 120 Stage 0
KOMPSAT and ACRIMSAT
Success
5
March 12, 2000
Air Force Taurus Configuration, 63" fairing, Peacekeeper Stage 0
Multispectral Thermal Imager (MTI)
Success
6
September 21, 2001
Model 2110, 63" fairing Castor 120 Stage 0
Orbview-4/QuickTOMS
Failure
7
May 20, 2004
Model 3210, 92" fairing, Castor 120 Stage 0
ROCSAT-2
Success
8
February 24, 2009
Model 3110, 63" fairing Castor 120 Stage 0
Orbiting Carbon Observatory [4]
Failure

ITS DIMENSIONS--

Height
27.9 m (91.5 ft)
Diameter
2.35 m (7.7 ft)
Mass
73,000 kg (160,000 lb)
Stages
4
Capacity IA
Payload to LEO
1,320 kg (2,910 lb)

CURRENTLY NASA IS STUDYING THE DISASTER AND WILL SUBMIT A REPORT SOON!!

Spinning galaxies can form a shortcut to universe?

dear all,
i have come up with one more idea. yest.. i was drinking milk and stirring the milk. as all know we see a hole that directly goes to the bottom of cup passing through the milk but not touching it. i.e not getting wet. similar is the eye of tornado. the tornada is nothing but air spinning in circular manner i.e clockwise in s.hemisphere and anti in northern hemisphere. the eye is the most dangerous place where the pressure and wind speed is maximum because of its configuration. but if we throw any object from helipcopter in the eye of tornado then that directly will fall down on the ground. such tornadoes is not possible in space<>.
so we can say that when a liquid,gaseous,solid object gains circular velocity then it produces a pit. this can be the answer to the wormholes or the space shortcuts.
we know the process of fussion of any cellestial objects. they are attracted by the gravity then they move circular to each other then they move away. this process continues till they collapse on each other. galaxies are enormous. if in future such thing is ought to happen because of configuration of universe. so a passage may form which can take us to some new place. regarding the passage,we can say we can go for time travel.

Akshay Deoras

NEED OF SPACE TRAFFIC CONTROLLER IN SPACE?

Dear all,

its a sad news for all the people who have interest in satellites. two of our friends namely iridium 33 and cosmos 2251 have collided in space.

In an unprecedented space collision, a commercial Iridium communications satellite (IRIDIUM 33, NORAD ID 24946) and a defunct Russian satellite (COSMOS 2251, NORAD ID 22675) ran into each other on February 10, 2009 above Northern Siberia, creating a cloud of debris. The impact occured at 16:56:00 UTC (11:56:00 AM EST), at Latitude 72° 30' 04'', Longitude 97° 52' 46'', Altitude 788.68 km (490.0 miles). into 600 pieces it can be said that it was not a malfunctioning.Iridium Satellite LLC operates a constellation of some 66 satellites, along with orbital spares, to support satellite telephone operations around the world. The spacecraft, which weigh about 1,485 pounds when fully fueled, are in orbits tilted 86.4 degrees to the equator at an altitude of about 485 miles. Ninety-five Iridium satellites were launched between 1997 and 2002 and several have failed over the years.
Yesterday, Iridium Satellite LLC lost an operational satellite, the company said in a statement. According to information shared with the company by various U.S. government organizations that monitor satellites and other space objects (such as debris), it appears that the satellite loss is the result of a collision with a non-operational Russian satellite.
Although this event has minimal impact on Iridium's service, the company is taking immediate action to address the loss. The Iridium constellation is healthy, and this event is not the result of a failure on the part of Iridium or its technology. While this is an extremely unusual, very low-probability event, the Iridium constellation is uniquely designed to withstand such an event, and the company is taking the necessary steps to replace the lost satellite with one of its in-orbit spare satellites.
Johnson said the collision was unprecedented.
Nothing to this extent (has happened before), he said. e've had three other accidental collisions between what we call catalog objects, but they were all much smaller than this and always a moderate sized objects and a very small object. And these are two relatively big objects. So this is a first, unfortunately.
As for the threat posed by the debris, Johnson said NASA carried out an immediate analysis to determine whether the space station faced any increased risk. The station, carrying three crew members, circles the globe at an altitude of about 220 miles in an orbit tilted 51.6 degrees to the equator.

from this as there are air traffice controllers here on earth,there have to be space traffic controller. There are two issues: the immediate threat and a longer-term threat,.It turns out, when you have a collision like this the debris is thrown very energetically both to higher orbits and to lower orbits. So there are actually debris from this event which we believe are going through the space station's altitude already. Most of it is not, most of it is still clustered up where the event took place. But a small number are going through station's altitude.

Most, if not all, of the debris is expected to eventually burn up in Earth's atmosphere

The journey to the Boundary of Universe!!!

Written by-

Akshay Deoras,Resp.. Thombre sir

Dear all,

this is my first article including the mixed ideas of me and my sir. although all the articles have been written after a prolonged discussion with him.

'THE JOURNEY TO THE BOUNDARY OF UNIVERSE'

This universe is great. the mysteries are locked in it but no one knows where are the keys.

we keep on saying that the universe is infinite and it has no end. but i believe it is the opposite. the universe is expanding continuously,every hour,minute second,microseconds. so it is not very easy to locate the boundary of universe as it is very clear that the boundary also moves forward with the growing universe. but there is a relativity in this aspect. if we suppose that there is a object A from where the boundary is 1 km away then bz of constant and uniform expansion the boundary will always remain at a distance of 1km from A. so the problem that comes is how to locate the boundary. if we take a spacecraft and try to go out of universe IN ANY DIRECTION, as the distance is enormous it will take millions of years to reach.. but if we follow the velocity of light the time will be less. the emphasis on this article is to tell abt the possibility of boundary,the abv one was a introduction to the concept..

article A]

- Resp.Thombre Sir

now if we want to reach the boundary of universe,we will definately have to accquire velocity more than that of light. so there are such radiations known as Hawking's radiation. this means as per einstein,the time for the observer<> will stop and we will go to the past. so we will not go towards the end/boundary of universe but towards the begining of universe.. this will change everything

P.S THE TIME TO REACH THE BOUNDARY WILL TAKE US IN FUTURE AS PER MY OTHER ARTICLES. SO THE ABOVE BOLD LINE IS USED

article b]

- Akshay Deoras

a continued part

similarly we can go in future and if it is so, then we will overcome the rate of expansion and we will go ahead the boundary of universe. thus again by relativity, we will move parallel with the boundary and the distance will be same.

How to identify that there is a boundary

possible explaination-

i, believe that it will be a region where the all energy <> will sum uo together and because of it if we try to escape the boundary suddenly we will be pulled in<like a trampolin> the more u jump the more u go up. The question arises that will the be powerful enough to bring back the light from escaping.if seen it is possible as well as not possible. as said by stephen hawking,Bekenstein-Hawking radiation escape through the corner of black hole.it is the gravitational force which is a major component in this deflection of light
so it is possible as the gravity that strong of the black hole changes the path of lightso all these forces may bring back the light.Think about it!!. if it is possible then we can locate the boundary of universe even by not going there. we can study the impact on objects which are near to the boundary like we do to study black holes.

so by observation from earth itself we can locate

3] by Resp Thombre sir-

this energy may be a energy less area. so nothing can pass through it. we have a controversy on it. but let us see what happens. nasa claims boundary abv 100 miles from earth.

the question arises what is behind that boundary. if we cross it will we be lost in time? i think if we cross that limit, we will go back to the begining of universe. possible explaination will be given by me soon. but may be to the shortcuts in universe and catestrough theory!!!

who knows what happens...

akshay deoras,D.P>Thombre

dimensions

we know the uses of dimensions.certainly as they are there,we are there. if we would have lived in 1 dimension space then we would have moved in one direction and we would have become flat

2] if we would have lived in 2D space then we would have gone back and forward but not up and down

3] as we have live in more than 2D including 3D we can move up and down.

4th dimension and 5th dimension are geometrically different and astronomically different

in space 4th dimension is of time.i want to state that why cant waves be the 5th dimension of space. note- i mean the em waves. we cant go with the sound as sound needs a medium of transmission in space--- solid/liquid/gas. but EM waves transmit without the need of medium

we say space is 3d with time 4th d. but every body in space has tendency of transmitting em waves either the paticles of alpha,beta,gamma

the dimensions can be called as the sides of object. now according to this defination, EM waves though are'nt the real sides of object but we can say they come out from the edges. likewise time goes with space so, it is a part of space like wise the EM waves are a part of cellestial objects..

Black Fear!!

recently, i heard about the planet nibiru. 2012 end of the world. it was heard that because of this planet's passby, there will be destruction.i am currently monitoring the position of this 10th planet. the title is pretty mysterious as fear is of this planet and black -black holes.
nowadays the concept of black holes is changed.earlier it was thought that nothing can escape the hole even the velocity of light. but it is now proved that light escapes through the corners of black hole. this is the hakwings radiations.. this is now helping the scientist to discover the black holes. though the eye of black hole cant be seen. we believe that there is a super-giant black hole at the center of milky way or you can say THE GALACTIC CENTER. but as the universe is expanding, it is not sure that there is blackhole and that will absorve earth. dark energy helps the expansion of universe but the black hole absorve the universe. if we say that it is correct then the universe will be in a neither expand-contract stage. but it is expanding. so the effect of this b.hole is not in picture till today. i personally believe that there has to be any mysterious body at the anti-galactic center
AKSHAY

Frame Of Refrences

12th jan,

ludhiana,punjab

Hey all my friends yest i was travelling. i saw two trains passing each other. suddenly i remebered that we see the velocity of our train.

CASE 1] when the train a is at rest and the train b is in motion. when the train pass each other,we see the train moving. if it is according to the above statement then it is wrong.

we see the velocity of the other train and not ours.

einstein explained that an obj a and obj b with the velocity of light when they cross each other

they feel each other with velocity of light

2] obj at half the velocity of light and b at the velocity of light

when they cross each other obj,a feels that obj moves with velocity of light\

SO WHEN WE SEE AN OBJECT CROSSING,WE SEE HIS VELOCITY AND NOT OUR!!

Regards

Akshay Deoras

Please Note!!

ALL, my dear readers.sorry bz of some work i was busy. so wish u a very happy and prosperous new year. The notice is that my article - the theory of similar and diff.time is under review. the third concept of black hole bn the earth and the sun and light b'n earth and sun will not travel is right. but light from betelguese will not reach the earth as there is black hole and as a result time will stop
Inconvenience is Greatly regretted!!



Akshay Deoras-

ALIENS INTELLIGENT THAN US? OR NOT?

surely,when I talk with my friends or see the news channels,they show- aliens are coming
they have all technology. The can kidnapp you..
A question arised in my mind why is it compulsary that aliens are intelligent than us?
Cant they be nomadic?
They say, they can control space and time but it may be that they dont knw anything about space and time as we know!
A concrete proof is hard to be mentioned as I haven't experienced the aliens nor most of us. The universe was born at the same time. Galaxies also developed at the same time. So,can we conclude that all the living forms are equally intelligent? The answer to this NO! We consider that among any two person,one is more intelligent. But what is intelligence? It is not scoring marks and all when we talk about science! I define it as the ability of a living being to understand the surroundings and get adopted to it. If we apply this definition, again a controversy arises. That is regarding Darwin's theory of evolution! Darwin stated that evoution is there which makes development.
Till today earth hasn't faced any problem from aliens like the attacks of UFO”S.
This has two meaning
1] are the aliens aware that there is no point in coming on the earth
2] they don't know what is earth!
Well if voting takes place,i am obvious that majority will say the option 1
evolution is caused because of changing surroundings with better adaptation.
We say universe is stable but I say earth has more or less same surroundings. But what about other galaxies and all.. It is my belief that the conditions on other places may be same.
This I justify with the birth of universe. There are exceptions. You can say why the earth has atmosphere and mercury. This is related to the fact of forces acting on these objects.. I say action of forces causes change of climate. Though many may oppose me. This is the reason why we are developed.

article to be completed
AKSHAY

A sudden change in the structure of Solar system!!!

My today's' discussions include the topic which was the main subject in controversy between Einstein-newton. newton told that if the sun is destroyed at once then the planets will leave their respective orbits.. but Einstein showed that it takes more than 8Min's for the light to travel from sun to earth.. so we will come to know abut it after 8Min's.. He said that space around the earth with time is curved. so the earth will leave the orbit but we will not know anything..
but why to talk abut sun only??? as it has the highest gravitational force? can't the other planets or even a celestial objects' change in orbit etc.. affect the journey of earth? I believe that it is possible!
Everyone must be shocked by it?
1] tides
why are the tides caused?
because of gravitational force of moon and sun on the surface of earth. thought they are farther from us still they have effect..
2] let us suppose that the moon is destroyed at once without notice. the moon is having effect on earth's rotation.. because of moon only earth is rotating. it is also said that the earth' s days are getting longer because moon is escaping the earth's g.pull by 4Cm's every year. so if there is no other body that is having its pull on earth other than sun,earth's rotation will cease and revolution will continue. so this will result that there will be no night and day only changes in seasons..
what will happen when the moon disappears at once? if it is correctly proved that earth's rotation is because of moon then if moon disappears, we will come to know abut it after 4Min's.. earth's rotation will cease at once but because of inertia earth will try to maintain its motion. so we will be jerked as we are when vehicle applies break suddenly.. this jerk will be tremendous may be equivalent to earth's speed of rotation..
3] it is that the gravity is the weakest among the nuclear force,electro-magnetic force,weak force.. but gravity is not destroyed.. so the asteroids around the earth or planets will start affecting the earth's rotation as now they will become more active after the disappearance of moon's gravity.. the asteroid/meteoroid passing around the earth will influence earth's rotational speed as well..
4] days on earth will be equivalent to years and anything can happen..
If there are some changes in the structure of planets around the earth then again there will be changes on earth as that changes will affect the moon and moon will affect the earth...
also because of energy stored in earth, there will be changes in structure of earth.
But there can be controversy as well.Since space and time are curved, the rotation can become faster
Conclusion
" moon's destruction"
1] stops earth's rotation
2] makes earth spin very fast
3] makes earth spin very slow
BUT THE MORE POSSIBLE EVENT IS STOPS EARTH'S ROTATION AS I MENTIONED ABT SPACE-TIME CURVATURE THIS WILL AFFECT THE REVOLUTION!!
Till that day get relaxed,
MERRY X'mas to all and Have happy holidays!!!
from your's Akshay Deoras

Uncertainty Principle!!

I am back after a week! today let us discuss about some thing which says old is gold..

In recess when i was standing by the ground, there was dust everywhere. i imagined that how would it be to be a particle of dust.. no place to go.. go where ever u want to go!!

i will explain what is the principle and its experiment!

1} CONCEPT

the particle of dust or any particle of matter has negligible or very minute mass.. this is the reason that makes the particle to move freely-- with the wind!!

2} it is very difficult to see these particles.

3} to track the velocity and magnitude of velocity that it has,we require some technology..

for that lights having less wavelength are sent to the particles.. but if we use higher technology to send beams of light the less we get about its position and magnitude.

4} so the less technology,the more accurate is the position..

this was said by stephen hawking..

i totally agree with it.. 

Akshay Deoras